What Type Of Pv Cells Are Best?

Types of Photovoltaic Cells

There are several major types of photovoltaic (PV) cells to consider for solar panels, each with their own advantages and disadvantages.

Crystalline Silicon Cells

Crystalline silicon cells are the most common type of PV cell, making up over 90% of the solar panel market. They are made from silicon wafers and come in two main types:

  • Monocrystalline – Made from a single crystal of silicon, these have the highest efficiency rates (15-20%) but are more expensive.
  • Polycrystalline – Made from multiple silicon crystal fragments, these are cheaper but slightly less efficient (13-16%).


  • Proven technology with reliable performance.
  • Long lifespan of around 25-30 years.


  • Higher costs than thin-film PV.
  • Efficiency decreases as temperature rises.

Thin-Film Cells

Thin-film cells are made by depositing photovoltaic material onto substrates like glass or plastic. Types include:

  • Amorphous silicon
  • Cadmium telluride (CdTe)
  • Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS)


  • Cheaper manufacturing than crystalline silicon.
  • Can be flexible and lightweight.
  • Better performance in high temperatures.


  • Lower efficiency rates (5-16%).
  • More prone to degradation over time.

Emerging Technologies

Some newer PV cell technologies that are still in early stages include:

  • Perovskites – Low-cost cells with rising lab efficiency rates.
  • Quantum dots – Tiny semiconductors with potential for high efficiency.
  • Organic photovoltaics – Carbon-based cells that can be transparent or flexible.

While promising, these are not yet ready for wide-scale commercialization and adoption.

Monocrystalline vs. Polycyrstalline Silicon Cells

When it comes to photovoltaic (PV) solar panels, two of the most common types of solar cells used are monocrystalline silicon and polycrystalline silicon cells. Both are made from silicon, but have some key differences.

Monocrystalline silicon cells are made from a single crystal of silicon. The manufacturing process results in a more uniform crystal lattice structure and higher purity of the silicon. This gives monocrystalline solar cells a distinctive black color and makes them more efficient at converting sunlight into electricity compared to other types of cells. Typical efficiency ratings for monocrystalline cells range from 15-20%.

Polycrystalline silicon, also known as multicrystalline silicon, cells are made from multiple crystals of silicon melted together. The crystallization process results in a more random crystal structure with some impurities and defects. Polycrystalline cells have a speckled blue color and lower silicon purity, which reduces efficiency compared to monocrystalline, typically around 13-16%. However, polycrystalline silicon cells can be cheaper to produce.

In terms of performance, monocrystalline silicon generally provides higher efficiency, producing more electricity per cell area. However, polycrystalline silicon offers a more cost-effective option that can still provide good performance, especially in hotter conditions where monocrystalline efficiency drops off more. Overall, both technologies are widely used in solar PV panels today, with monocrystalline favored for maximum efficiency and polycrystalline for more affordable panels.

Overview of Thin Film PV Types

Thin film solar cells are made by depositing one or more thin layers of photovoltaic material onto a substrate like glass, plastic or metal. The thin layers allow manufacturers to produce solar cells using less raw material than conventional solar cells. The two main types of thin film solar cells are cadmium telluride (CdTe) and copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS).

Cadmium telluride (CdTe) solar cells use a thin layer of cadmium telluride coated onto glass to absorb and convert sunlight into electricity. CdTe cells have lower manufacturing costs compared to conventional silicon cells, allowing them to achieve lower costs per watt. They have conversion efficiencies around 22% and good performance in warm weather and low-light conditions. The high cadmium content raises some environmental concerns.

Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) solar cells contain four different elements – copper, indium, gallium and selenium. The layers absorb sunlight and generate electricity without silicon. CIGS cells have high absorption and conversion efficiency, up to 23%. But indium is a rare element, limiting large-scale manufacturing. CIGS cells have shown good durability and temperature resistance.

Organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs) are a type of solar cell made from organic (carbon-based) electronics such as polymers and small molecules. Unlike traditional silicon solar cells, OPVs use organic semiconductors that absorb light and generate electricity. Some key features of organic PV cells include:

  • Lower production costs – OPVs can be manufactured using solution-based processes like roll-to-roll printing, allowing high throughput and low materials costs.
  • Mechanical flexibility – Organic PV films can be made thin, lightweight, and flexible. This enables new applications like portable devices or building-integrated photovoltaics.
  • Customizable appearance – Changing the organic chemistry allows tuning of the solar cell color and transparency.
  • Low temperature processing – OPVs can be fabricated at temperatures under 150°C, enabling deposition on plastic substrates.

While organic solar cells have lower efficiencies than traditional silicon cells, they compensate with potential advantages in production cost, flexibility, weight, and aesthetics. Continued research aims to enhance the performance and lifetime of OPV devices.

Emerging Perovskite Solar Cells

In recent years, a new type of solar cell material called perovskites has emerged as a promising option for photovoltaics. Perovskites refer to a specific crystal structure formed by certain compounds, most commonly hybrid organic-inorganic lead or tin halides. The perovskite structure enables efficient light absorption and charge separation, making them well-suited for converting sunlight into electricity.

Perovskite solar cells were first popularized in 2009 by a Japanese research team led by Tsutomu Miyasaka. Since then, research into perovskites has rapidly accelerated, with power conversion efficiencies skyrocketing from 3.8% to over 25% in just a few years. This rapid rate of progress is unprecedented in the field of photovoltaics.

Compared to conventional silicon solar cells, perovskite solar cells offer potential advantages such as:

  • Higher theoretical efficiency limit
  • Tunable bandgap using different perovskite compositions
  • Relatively inexpensive, low-temperature processing
  • Flexible, lightweight modules
  • Semitransparent, multi-colored cells

While very promising, perovskites still face challenges with toxicity, stability and scaling up fabrication methods. More research is needed to improve durability and commercial viability. But if these challenges can be overcome, perovskites could play a major role in making solar power more efficient and affordable in the future.

Compare lifespan and degradation rates

When comparing photovoltaic cell types, it’s important to consider their lifespan and degradation rates. The lifespan of a PV cell refers to how long it will continue to function and produce electricity at a reasonable efficiency before needing to be replaced. The degradation rate is the gradual loss of power conversion efficiency over time.

Crystalline silicon cells, which make up over 90% of the PV market, have an average lifespan of 25-30 years and degradation rates of around 0.5% per year. This means after 30 years, they will produce around 80% of their original rated power output. Thin film technologies like Cadmium Telluride (CdTe) have slightly shorter lifespans of 20-25 years but lower degradation rates of 0.1-0.2% per year. Other thin films like Copper Indium Gallium Selenide (CIGS) have lifespans and degradation rates comparable to crystalline silicon.

Newer technologies like perovskites have shown degradation rates as low as 0.2-0.3% per year in lab testing, but their long-term lifespan in real-world conditions is still being evaluated. Overall, crystalline silicon offers the best combined lifespan and degradation rate for long-term power production. Thin films can experience faster degradation but may be suitable for shorter-lifetime applications.

Types of Photovoltaic Cells

There are three main types of photovoltaic (PV) cells used in solar panels – monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin film. The type of PV cell used impacts the efficiency and cost of the solar panel.

Monocrystalline silicon PV cells are made from a single cylindrical silicon crystal. They have the highest efficiency rates, typically around 15-20%, but are more expensive than other types. Their distinctive look comes from the single crystal shape.

Polycrystalline silicon PV cells are made from fragments of different silicon crystals. They have slightly lower efficiency rates than monocrystalline, normally 13-16%, but are cheaper to produce. Their bluish color comes from the multiple silicon crystal fragments.

Thin film PV cells use layers of semiconductor material deposited on glass or stainless steel. Because they use less silicon, they are cheaper but have much lower efficiencies of 7-13%. Amorphous silicon and cadmium telluride are common thin film materials.

Overall, monocrystalline PV cells tend to be the best option when efficiency is the priority and cost is less of a concern. Polycrystalline strikes a good balance between price and efficiency. Thin film works best when cost savings outweigh the need for top efficiency.

Manufacturing Costs

There are several factors that contribute to the total manufacturing cost of a PV module. While the costs vary between cell types, some key considerations are:

  • Materials – Silicon cells require high purity silicon while thin film uses abundant, lower cost materials like cadmium and copper. This gives thin film cells an advantage.
  • Equipment – Fabricating conventional silicon cells requires expensive semiconductor processing equipment. Thin films can use simpler, less expensive tools like screen printing.
  • Yield – Monocrystalline silicon has yield rates around 15% while thin film is 5-7%. The more waste, the higher the module cost.
  • Processing – Many steps are needed to make a silicon cell versus 1-2 for thin films. More steps means higher fixed costs.
  • Scale – Silicon benefits from economies of scale in GW-sized factories. Smaller thin film lines lack this advantage.
  • Labor – Silicon factories in low labor cost regions like China offer cost benefits.

Overall, thin film PV minimizes material waste, requires simpler equipment, and uses faster processes. This gives it a strong cost advantage over conventional silicon PV manufacturing.

Comparing Different Types of Photovoltaic Solar Cells

When evaluating which type of photovoltaic (PV) solar cell is “best,” it is important to consider multiple factors, as different PV technologies have different strengths and weaknesses. Some key aspects to analyze include efficiency, cost, lifespan, environmental impact, and material availability.

In terms of efficiency, mono-crystalline silicon cells tend to have the highest conversion rates, with lab cell efficiencies over 25%. Multi-crystalline silicon and thin film technologies, like cadmium telluride and copper indium gallium selenide, have slightly lower efficiencies in the 15-22% range. However, real-world performance depends on installation factors too.

Regarding cost, multi-crystalline silicon PV and thin films tend to be cheaper per watt than mono-crystalline. But balance of system components can affect overall system pricing. Lifespans also vary, with mono- and multi- crystalline silicon panels typically lasting 25-30 years, while thin film may degrade faster over time.

In terms of environmental impact, crystalline silicon PV has moderately high embodied energy from processing, while thin films use rare or toxic materials. Yet all PV offsets fossil fuel use over time. Availability of raw materials differs as well, with silicon being abundant, but tellurium for some thin films being rare.

Overall there is no definitive “best” PV cell. Specific applications, budgets, locations and goals help determine if mono- or multi-crystalline silicon, thin film, or an emerging technology like perovskites or organic PV make the most sense. But all solar PV produces clean renewable power from an endless free fuel source – the sun.

There are several factors to consider when determining the best type of photovoltaic (PV) cell for a given application. The main types of PV cells available today include monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, thin film, and organic PV cells. Each has advantages and disadvantages that make them more or less suitable depending on the context.

For most residential and commercial rooftop solar installations, monocrystalline silicon PV cells tend to be the best overall choice. Monocrystalline cells have the highest efficiency rates, typically around 15-22%, meaning they produce more electricity per square foot than other types. They perform well in high temperatures and low light conditions. The drawbacks are their slightly higher cost and more complex manufacturing process.

For large-scale ground mount solar farms, polycrystalline silicon PV cells can be a better option. They are cheaper to manufacture than monocrystalline, while still reasonably efficient at 13-17%. The lower cost per watt makes them ideal when space and installation costs are less critical factors.

Thin film PV cells can be a good choice where flexibility and light weight are needed, such as on vehicles or camping equipment. Their efficiencies of 7-13% are lower, but the flexibility and light weight provide tradeoffs that work well for mobility applications. Organic PV cells are still an emerging technology with efficiencies below 10%, but they are extremely lightweight and potentially economical to produce at scale.

In summary, monocrystalline silicon PV cells offer the best overall performance and are suitable for most applications. Lower cost polycrystalline cells can be advantageous for large utility-scale solar farms where every percentage of efficiency is less critical. Thin film and organic cells fill specialty niches where flexibility or lightweight are priorities.

Similar Posts