Which Pv Technology Is Most Effective?

There are several different photovoltaic (PV) solar panel technologies available today that convert sunlight into electricity. Broadly, these can be categorized into first generation, second generation, and third generation PV technologies. When deciding which PV technology is most effective, it is important to evaluate factors like efficiency, cost, performance, reliability, and environmental impact.

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the major PV solar panel technologies and analyze their effectiveness based on key criteria. This will help identify which PV technology is optimal for certain applications and use cases.

Solar Panel Types

There are several main types of solar panels used in residential and commercial installations today:

Crystalline Silicon Panels

Crystalline silicon panels are the most common solar panel type, accounting for over 90% of the global solar market. They are made from silicon wafers and come in two main varieties:

    monocrystalline solar panels are made from a single silicon crystal, giving them a uniform black appearance and higher efficiency than polycrystalline panels.

  • Monocrystalline – Made from a single continuous crystal of silicon, these panels have a uniform black appearance and higher efficiency ratings than polycrystalline, typically around 15-20%. Source
  • Polycrystalline – Made from fragments of silicon crystals, these panels have a speckled blue appearance and slightly lower efficiency ratings around 13-16%. However, they tend to be cheaper than monocrystalline. Source

Thin Film Panels

Thin film panels are made by depositing one or more thin layers of photovoltaic material onto a substrate like glass or plastic. Types of thin film solar panels include:

  • Amorphous silicon (a-Si) – Used mostly for small electronics and low wattage applications due to low efficiency of around 6-8%.
  • Cadmium telluride (CdTe) – More efficient than a-Si with ratings of around 11-12%, but use toxic cadmium.
  • Copper indium gallium (di)selenide (CIGS) – Efficient at around 13-15% but production is limited due to high costs.

Thin film panels tend to be cheaper but degrade faster than crystalline silicon panels. Source

Emerging Technologies

Some emerging solar technologies that are still under development include multi-junction cells, organic photovoltaics, quantum dots, and perovskites. These aim to improve efficiency, versatility, and production costs compared to conventional solar panels.


Solar panel efficiency refers to the percentage of sunlight that hits the panel that is converted into electricity. It is determined by dividing a panel’s wattage output by the total solar irradiance (sunlight) that hits the panel’s surface area.

According to Aurora Solar, monocrystalline solar panels typically have the highest efficiencies, ranging from 15-22%. Polycrystalline panels are slightly less efficient, with 12-18% efficiency on average. Thin-film panels tend to have the lowest efficiency levels, around 7-13%.

As MarketWatch reports, real-world efficiency ratings are often lower than manufacturers’ reported efficiency levels. Factors like hot temperatures, shading, and aging can reduce the amount of sunlight converted to electricity over time.

Overall, monocrystalline panels offer the highest efficiency levels, followed by polycrystalline and thin-film. However, efficiency is just one factor to consider – cost, performance, reliability and environmental impact also play key roles in determining the best PV technology.


The cost of solar panels includes both the upfront price of the panels themselves as well as the installation and long-term maintenance expenses. According to CNET, solar panels alone can cost between $0.80 to $1.80 per watt, depending on the type, size and application1. For a typical 6 kW system for a home, the solar panels may cost $4,800 to $10,800 just for the equipment. However, professional installation often doubles the total upfront price. The average cost to install solar panels on a 1,500 square foot roof in the U.S. is about $14,000 before incentives according to This Old House2.

Over the lifetime of a solar system, costs are much lower especially as panel efficiency improves and electricity rates rise. Most solar panels come with 20-25 year warranties and can last even longer. Forbes reports that over 30 years, solar power from a home system can cost half as much as relying solely on the grid3. Solar panel prices have also been dropping by 10% or more per year, making systems much more affordable than even a few years ago.


When evaluating the performance of different solar panel types, three key factors to consider are capacity factors, degradation rates, and temperature effects.

Capacity factor refers to the ratio of the actual electrical energy output over a period of time compared to the maximum possible output if the panels operated at full nameplate capacity 24/7. According to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), monocrystalline panels tend to have slightly higher capacity factors than polycrystalline and thin film technologies. Monocrystalline capacity factors range from 16-19%, polycrystalline 14-17%, and thin film 11-16% [1].

In terms of degradation, monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels experience similar annual losses in efficiency of around 0.5-0.8% per year. However, thin film degrades faster at 0.5-1% annually. After 25 years, monocrystalline and polycrystalline panels retain around 80% of their original efficiency, while thin film drops to 70% [2].

Higher operating temperatures negatively impact solar panel efficiency. Monocrystalline is slightly less affected by temperature with efficiency losses of around -0.35%/°C. Polycrystalline and thin film are more impacted at -0.4 to -0.5%/°C [3].

Environmental Impact

The environmental impact of solar panel manufacturing has improved dramatically in the last decade. The carbon emissions from manufacturing solar panels has declined by up to 90% (KubyEnergy, 2023). However, producing the raw materials like silicon, copper, and glass is still energy intensive. Recycling solar panels at the end of their lifespan (20-30 years) also requires energy for transportation and processing. Overall, the carbon emissions from manufacturing solar panels pays back within 1-4 years of use (Ecowatch, 2022).

In terms of land use, utility-scale solar farms require significant acreage. However, the land can often still be used for grazing livestock and planting native grasses and flowers. Rooftop solar minimizes land use impact. Overall, solar energy uses far less land than fossil fuels per unit of energy produced (UCSUSA, 2013).

When solar panels are disposed of properly, they are up to 85% recyclable. Semiconductor materials and metals like silicon, silver, copper and aluminum can be recovered and reused in new solar panels or other electronics (KubyEnergy, 2023). Proper solar panel disposal and recycling is important to minimize environmental contamination.


The reliability of solar panels depends on their durability and ability to withstand damage over time. Typically, solar panels are designed to operate efficiently for 25-30 years. However, their lifespan can be impacted by manufacturing defects, improper installation, and exposure to harsh weather.

According to a 30-year study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the failure rates for solar panels are very low[1]. Thin-film solar panels had the highest rate of 0.5% per year, while monocrystalline panels only saw 0.2% degradation per year. Most issues stemmed from the inverter and not the solar panels themselves.

To provide assurance on longevity, solar panel manufacturers usually offer 10-25 year warranties on their products[2]. Coverage often includes defects as well as a certain level of performance degradation over time. Many manufacturers like SunPower provide 25-year warranties that guarantee at least 92% production capacity in year 25.

Solar panels are designed to be rugged and resilient to damage. Lab tests show they can withstand heavy hailstones, snow loads, and wind speeds over 120 mph[3]. Real-world data has proven their durability in extreme weather events like hurricanes and tornadoes. Proper installation is key, but solar panels tend to hold up well even after major storms.

[1] https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/51664.pdf
[2] https://www.energysage.com/solar/solar-energy-storage/solar-panels/solar-panel-warranties-and-guarantees/
[3] https://ases.org/resources/renewable-energy-home-basics/solar-performance-buying-reliability-and-maintenance-in-photovoltaics/

Use Cases

Solar panels can be used in a variety of applications, from small residential systems to large commercial and utility-scale projects.


For homes, solar panels are typically installed on the roof to offset electricity usage. The most common residential systems range from 5-10 kW in size. With net metering, any excess solar electricity produced during the day can be fed back into the grid and credited to the homeowner’s utility bill. Smaller 1-2 kW systems may only power critical loads or appliances during a power outage. According to Energysage, the average solar panel system size for a home is between 3-8 kW. [1]


For commercial and industrial applications, solar systems are scaled up in size, with typical systems ranging from 10 kW up to the megawatt scale. These systems offset daytime electric loads and reduce demand charges for the building or facility. Parking shade structures with solar panels are a popular choice, along with rooftop installations. According to the Solar Energy Industries Association, the average commercial system size in 2021 was 283 kW. [2]


At the utility scale, large solar farms can produce hundreds of megawatts of power to feed into the grid. These systems make use of vacant land and consist of many rows of ground-mounted solar panels on sun-tracking mounts. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the average size of new utility-scale solar installations in 2021 was 105 MW. [3]


When it comes to identifying the most effective PV technology overall, monocrystalline solar panels are the clear winner. Monocrystalline solar panels have the highest efficiency ratings, typically between 15-22%, enabling them to produce more electricity than other panel types. They also have a smaller footprint and better performance in low light or high temperatures. While monocrystalline panels tend to be more expensive upfront, their superior efficiency and energy production lead to better long-term value.

For residential installations, monocrystalline panels are the ideal choice in most cases. Their sleek black appearance can blend nicely onto rooftops. Monocrystalline panels work efficiently even when space is limited. For utility-scale solar farms, monocrystalline panels maximize energy generation from the available land area.

The runners up are polycrystalline and thin-film panels. Polycrystalline panels are nearly as efficient as monocrystalline, with typical ratings of 13-18%. They tend to be cheaper in upfront costs. Thin-film panels use less silicon and have flexibility for building-integrated installations, but lower efficiency of 8-13%.

For certain specific applications, polycrystalline or thin-film may be preferable. In very hot climates, polycrystalline panels hold up better than monocrystalline. For large industrial rooftops, thin-film can provide lightweight, flexible coverage. Overall though, monocrystalline offers the best combination of high efficiency, proven reliability, and value for most solar panel uses.


When selecting the most effective PV technology, the answer depends largely on the intended application and use case. Factors like efficiency, cost, performance, reliability and environmental impact must be weighed against the project goals and constraints.

For most residential and commercial rooftop solar installations, monocrystalline silicon panels offer the best balance of high efficiency and reasonable cost. The additional efficiency of monocrystalline over polycrystalline makes them a better choice when roof space is limited.

For large scale utility projects where cost is paramount, polycrystalline and thin film technologies like cadmium telluride provide a cheaper alternative, despite slightly lower efficiency ratings. The scale of these large solar farms offsets the efficiency limitations.

In the end, carefully evaluating the technology options based on intended use allows matching the right PV solution to the application. This ensures maximum solar energy production and return on investment.
As the solar industry continues maturing and new technologies emerge, staying abreast of the latest developments will be key for determining the most effective PV technologies.

Similar Posts